Türkçe Book Chapter
Adinda, D., & Mohib, N. (2020). Teaching and instructional design approaches to enhance students’ self-directed learning in blended learning environments. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(2), 162-174. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.18.2.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Afandi, A., Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development frameworks of the Indonesian partnership 21st-century skills standards for prospective science teachers: A delphi study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1),89-100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Ajani, O. A. (2026). Exploring the impact of the teacher education curriculum on 21st-century skill development among pre-service teachers at a selected rural university. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 36(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.47381/aijre.v36i1.795 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Akçayoğlu, D. İ., & Dağgöl, G. D. (2019). A study on the perceived media literacy level of preparatory year students in a university setting. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Arslan, A. (2020). Öğretmen adayları perspektifinden pandemi öncesi ve sonrası öğrencilere kazandırılması gereken 21. yüzyıl becerilerinin belirlenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.779446 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Association of College and Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework [Google Scholar] Biesta, G. (2002). Bildung and modernity: The future of Bildung in a world of difference. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019874106870 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Budhrani, K., Ji, Y., & Lim, J. H. (2018). Unpacking conceptual elements of smart learning in the Korean scholarly discourse. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1),1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0069-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Bunt, B., & Gouws, G. (2020). Using an artificial life simulation to enhance reflective critical thinking among student teachers. Smart Learning Environments, 7, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00119-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Chang, S.-C., & Wongwatkit, C. (2024). Effects of a peer assessment-based scrum project learning system on computer programming’s learning motivation, collaboration, communication, critical thinking, and cognitive load. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 7105–7128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12084-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Chen, C., & Huang, M.-Y. (2024). Enhancing programming learning performance through a Jigsaw collaborative learning method in a metaverse virtual space. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00495-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Çukurova, M., Luckin, R., Millán, E., & Mavrikis, M. (2018). The NISPI framework: Analysing collaborative problem-solving from students’ physical interactions. Computers & Education, 116, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51–76). Solution Tree Press. [Google Scholar] Divjak, B., Rienties, B., Iniesto, F., Vondra, P., & Žižak, M. (2022). Flipped classrooms in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings and future research recommendations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00316-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Donkor, A., & Banki, R. D. (2017). Assessing the impact of in-service training programmes on basic school teachers of China in the kassena nankana west district of Ghana. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(4),64-76. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v6n4a8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Geissler, D., Robertson, C., & Feuerriegel, S. (2026). Designing effective digital literacy interventions for boosting deepfake discernment. In Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Goto, O., & Goto, J. (2026). Zimbabwean high school teachers’ perception of the 4Cs: Perspectives on 21st century learning and innovation skills. South African Journal of Education, 46(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v46n1a2609 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Gottschalk, F., & Weise, C. (2023). Digital equity and inclusion in education: An overview of practice and policy in OECD countries (OECD Education Working Papers No. 299). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7cb15030-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Gross, L. (2023). Chapter I: definition: creativity: process, personality. In Public domain series (pp. 2–9). Mediastudies Press https://doi.org/10.32376/3f8575cb.51961e55 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Guerra, A., Chen, J., Winther, M., & Kolmos, A. (Eds.). (2020). Educate for the future: PBL, sustainability and digitalisation 2020(1. ed.). Aalborg Universitetsforlag. International Research Symposium on PBL https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/357965178/AAU_8th_PBL_2020_interaktiv_2.pdf [Google Scholar] Händel, M., Berges, M.-P., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kudlich, H., Martschinke, S., & Pirner, M. L. (2025). Who is savvy about digital ethics? Differences between teacher education, law, and computer science students. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 25177–25196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13714-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Hassani, H., Silva, E. S., & Kaabi, A. M. A. (2017). The role of innovation and technology in sustaining the petroleum and petrochemical industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Högsdal, S., & Grundmeier, A.-M. (2021). Integrating design thinking in teacher education: Student teachers develop learning scenarios for elementary schools. The International Journal of Design Education, 16(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-128X/CGP/v16i01/1-26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Huynh, T.-N., Le, T.-T., Dang, B., An, B. T., Vu, C.-T., & Nguyen, A. (2025). Mindset matters: Fostering teachers’ responsible AI use through professional development. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-025-00043-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Kızıltaş, Y., & Kultaş, E. (2025). The effect of Web 2.0 tools on primary school students’ writing motivation and their role in developing creative writing skills. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15993–16022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13419-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Liu, S., & Liu, M. (2020). The impact of learner metacognition and goal orientation on problem-solving in a serious game environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Loyens, S. M. M., van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating higher-order, critical, and critical-analytic thinking in problem- and project-based learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Lu, S.-Y., Lo, C.-C., & Syu, J.-Y. (2022). Project-based learning oriented STEAM: The case of micro–bit paper-cutting lamp. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 2553–2575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09714-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] MacCallum, K., Parsons, D., & Mohaghegh, M. (2026). The scaffolded AI literacy (SAIL) framework: Results of a Delphi study for equitable AI literacy framework design in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10, 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100584 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Martin, A. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Mkhavele, V. A., & Ntshakala, T. (2018). Entrepreneurship in the rural context: Practical reflection on success and innovation. African Journal of Business Management, 12(21), 640–651. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2018.8617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Morreale, S. P., Valenzano, J. M., & Bauer, J. A. (2017). Why communication education is important: A third study on the centrality of the discipline’s content and pedagogy. Communication Education, 66(4), 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1265136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] OECD. (2017). How technology and globalisation are transforming the labour market. In OECD employment outlook 2017 (pp. 81–124). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2017-7-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref] OECD. (2019). Making adult learning systems future-ready for all. In OECD employment outlook 2019: The future of work (pp. 235–292). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bb84f968-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref] OECD. (2019a). OECD Learning Compass 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/learning/learning-compass-2030/ [Google Scholar] OECD. (2019b). OECD future of education and skills 2030. Conceptual learning framework. Transformative competencies for 2030. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] Omariba, A., & Noah, A. (2026). Rethinking teacher education for a changing world: New competencies for a new era. East African Journal of Education Studies, 9(2), 165–198. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.9.2.4813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Orakcı, Ş. (2021). Türkiye’de ayrılıp birleşme tekniğine ilişkin yapılan çalışmaların incelenmesi (2010–2020). Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(31), 252–276. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.642806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519462.pdf [Google Scholar] Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts: A review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1005–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Qadir, J., Yau, K.-L. A., Imran, M. A., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2020). Engineering education, moving into 2020s: Essential competencies for effective 21st century electrical & computer engineers. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Romero, M., Arnab, S., De Smet, C., Mohamad, F. S., Minoi, J.-L., & Morini, L. (2019). Assessment of co-creativity in the process of game design. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 17(3), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.17.3.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Saimon, M., Lavicza, Z., & Dana-Picard, T. (2023). Enhancing the 4Cs among college students of a communication skills course in Tanzania through a project-based learning model. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6269–6285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11406-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Schäfer, S. K., Kunzler, A. M., Kalisch, R., Tüscher, O., & Lieb, K. (2022). Trajectories of resilience and mental distress to global major disruptions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(12), 1171–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Schmitz, M.L., Consoli, T., Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A. A. P., Gonon, P., & Petko, D. (2024). Why do some teachers teach media literacy while others do not? Exploring predictors along the “will, skill, tool, pedagogy” model. Computers in Human Behavior, 151, 108004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Shu, Y., Ho, S.-J., & Huang, T.-C. (2020). The development of a sustainability-oriented creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education framework: A perspective study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2017). Revealing the processes of students’ interaction with a novel collaborative problem solving task: An in-depth analysis of think-aloud protocols. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Stijepic, D. (2020). Employment effects of skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC. International Labour Review, 159(3), 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Subiyantoro, S., Hidayati, A., Hadiprasetyo, K., Susilowati, D., Ismail, & Afghohani, A. (2024). Investigating students’ perceptions of collaborative online project-based learning in higher education. International Journal of Integrative Research, 2(5), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijir.v2i5.1777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Tahirsylaj, A. (2023). Bildung and twenty-first century competences: In need of mutual recognition. In M. Uljens (Ed.), Non-affirmative theory of education and Bildung (pp. 317–334). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30551-1_15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Tınmaz, H., Lee, Y.-T., Fanea-Ivanovici, M., & Baber, H. (2022). A systematic review on digital literacy. Smart Learning Environments, 9, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00204-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Turashkati, F. I. (2025). Education, culture, and digital futures: Building inclusive learning systems in Nigeria and beyond. Educational Science and Practice, 1(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.64229/a7yar444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Uerz, D. C., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656 [Google Scholar] UNESCO. (2018). Global citizenship education: Taking it local. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265456 [Google Scholar] UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Uysal, Ö. (2021). Proje tabanlı öğrenme ile kazanılan 21. yüzyıl becerilerine yönelik bir nitel araştırma. Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Dergisi, 4(2), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.47477/ubed.952556 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Vives, E., Poletti, C., Robert, A., Butera, F., Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2025). Learning with jigsaw: A systematic review gathering all the pieces of the puzzle more than 40 years later. Review of Educational Research, 95(3), 339–384. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241230064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] Wheelahan, L., Moodie, G., & Doughney, J. (2022). Challenging the skills fetish. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(3), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2045186 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. YY. Becerileri ve Öğretmen Eğitimi
Rümeysa Pektaş
Assist. Prof. Dr., SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL UNIVERSITY
Abstract
Bu bölüm, 21. yüzyıl becerilerinin eğitim sistemleri ve öğretmen eğitimi açısından taşıdığı dönüştürücü önemi ele almaktadır. Çalışmada, eleştirel düşünme, problem çözme, yaratıcılık, inovasyon, iş birliği ve iletişimden oluşan öğrenme ve inovasyon becerileri; bilgi, medya, BİT ve yapay zekâ okuryazarlığını kapsayan dijital okuryazarlık becerileri ile esneklik, öz yönlendirme, sosyal ve kültürlerarası beceriler, üretkenlik ve hesap verebilirlikten oluşan yaşam ve kariyer becerileri bütüncül bir çerçevede incelenmektedir. Bölümde, bu becerilerin yalnızca iş gücü piyasasının taleplerine indirgenmemesi; bireyin entelektüel, kültürel, etik ve toplumsal gelişimini destekleyen daha geniş bir eğitim felsefesi içinde ele alınması gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır. Öğretmen eğitimi bağlamında ise geleneksel TPAB modelinin yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı, etik kullanım, veri gizliliği ve algoritmik adalet gibi yeni yeterlik alanlarıyla genişletilmesi gerektiği tartışılmaktadır. Ayrıca Jigsaw tekniği ve ters yüz edilmiş sınıf modeli gibi öğrenci merkezli pedagojik uygulamalar aracılığıyla 21. yüzyıl becerilerinin sınıf ortamına nasıl entegre edilebileceği örneklendirilmektedir. Bu uygulamalar, öğretmen adaylarının söz konusu becerileri yalnızca kuramsal olarak öğrenmelerini değil, aynı zamanda deneyimlemelerini, modellemelerini ve gelecekteki sınıf pratiklerine aktarabilmelerini destekleyen somut öğrenme yaşantıları olarak sunulmaktadır. Böylece bölüm, kuramsal tartışma ile uygulama önerilerini bir araya getiren bütüncül bir öğretmen eğitimi perspektifi geliştirmektedir. Sonuç olarak bölüm, öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının disiplinler arası, uygulama temelli, etik duyarlılığı yüksek, kapsayıcı ve dijital çağın gereklilikleriyle uyumlu biçimde yeniden yapılandırılmasını önermektedir.
Keywords: 21. Yüzyıl Becerileri, Öğretmen Eğitimi, Dijital Okuryazarlık, Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı, TPAB
Subject: Social Sciences -> Education -> Education & Educational Research
Cite this chapter